I hate Wikipedia

If you say something bad about someone, it's slander. It doesn't matter whether or not that "something bad" is true or not because it's slander either way and is a felony if it's done against a corporation. Since James is a corporation (he says he is, so he is) he deserves to be treated the same way that legitimate companies get treated.

Further evidence is at User_talk:62.20.102.130#Ladies_and_Gentlemen_of_the_Jury.... Just follow the links to see the blatant harassment and vandalism from James Ewing. I say this is James because he's been rumored to be real big on harassing disgruntled ex-customers. But what are the odds of a random vandal posting from the subnet he personally owns?

Yes, he posted personal information from his computer (62.20.102.130) on his subnet (62.20.102.128/25), which is registered to him. So what? Nobody deserves to be anonymous on the Internet -- especially people who break the laws that he interprets!