Happy 44th Birthday, James!

For his birthday, James decided to create fake profiles on LinkedIn. Of course, they were deleted after a few days. On a related note, James continues to bring up arguments with subscribers who demanded a refund several years ago! Talk about immature…

It’s sad that a 44-year-old male — a man who was once the cream of the crop in his line of work — has degenerated into a vengeful hermit.

Some People Can't Stand Losing

It appears our friend is back in action! He added this piece of "information" to Wikipedia:

Revision as of 07:05, July 29, 2007
(Note: this information not accurate but keeps being reposted to Wikipedia as if it were).

Does James have nothing better to do?

P.S. The IP address posting this information is 213.89.48.116, which reverse-resolves to c213-89-48-116.bredband.comhem.se. That's in Sweden (what a friggin' surprise there!).

The Marching Moron

James still thinks my name is Andrew. Or maybe today it's Gary. Who knows... he can't seem to figure out who I really am!

I've heard that frustration and anger can interfere with higher brain functions. In James Ewing's case, he's an imbecile. He's already tried to erase negative information from Wikipedia, but Tor nodes are quickly blocked there so he's relying on his vandalism of Seattle Wireless' wiki.

UPDATE: Seattle Wireless protected the SveaSoft page, but James tried to bypass the protection by registering under the username "Muckle Torkle." The username was subsequently deleted and protection was fully restored. Way to go, Seattle!

James, James, James... do you really think you can convince anyone your company is not a miserable failure by insulting me? Or maybe you're not insulting me! Who knows... according to James, I've got dozens of names!!

Why wouldn't he box?

Sveasoft squatting on misleading domains (like free-wrt.com and open-wrt.com) makes quite a bit of sense.

But this doesn't make any sense: squatting on willybox.com.

Seriously, could someone explain this?

Has James Ewing finally gone off the deep end?

Shouldn't he be saving money for his upcoming alimony payments? (Just kidding -- but seriously, some visitors from Sweden have been visiting and one of them might be his wife).

Anyway, send me a comment (below) with your consipracy theory.

James Ewing ain't no Matlock

It appears James has tried again to find my identity. Of course, he fails miserably: first he says my name's Αndrеw Βοurkе, then he says my name's Gаrу Whіtmοrе. C'mon, James... your lame attempts at "outing" people on the Internet are not only inaccurate, they're just plain funny.

Do you honestly believe that I'd let my identity leak out so you'd get it? Hell no!



P.S. Next time I call Åsa, I'll tell her that you've been touching Lucas and Ryan in naughty places. But that idle threat pales in comparison to what you've done to hundreds of former customers.

James Ewing: The Retarded Sherlock Holmes

James thinks he's making progress with posting personal information and spamming it on this blog:

------=_Part_1181_30263852.1170252605081
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "James Ewing patents HTTP tunneling":

http://child-predator.blogspot.com

Think again, James! I've already had my phone number changed, since (unlike you) I've got a steady income to pay for the $7.50 surcharge. You aren't scaring me!

P.S.: I'm not going to disable anonymous comments, but I will continue to moderate them.

Phone books aren't confidential

A certain someone thought that this cached Web site was "confidential information". It would just make too much sense to accuse James Ewing of calling people non-stop since he has VoIP accounts.

Apparently, phone books are confidential information as well. The following phone numbers were in question:

• +1 (410) 563-8397
• +1 (443) 267-0064
• +1 (443) 524-7200
  All three were found in the WHOIS data for jsci.net.
  
• +1 (443) 524-6540
• +1 (866) 229-1542
  Found in this public directory.
  

Why does James Ewing not want people to know his business information? Does he not want people knowing how to contact his place of business?

James loves the DMCA

James sent a Digital Millenium Copyright Act letter to Google. This means he's totally bad-ass. James sent the letter via fax machine, because e-mail sucks balls and anyone who's anyone uses a fax machine.